The first post in this two-part series reflected on a shifting landscape that is moving away from simply trying to grab consumers’ attention, and instead focuses on becoming relevant and responsive to the demand of their lives. The Economy of Relevance is one where the brand with the most useful, helpful or pertinent marketing wins. But that takes a brand willing to get responsive and agile.
Here are just a few recent, stellar examples of responsive advertising that dominates the Economy of Relevance:

1. Ad agency SK+G of Las Vegas recently competed on AMCTV’s “The Pitch” against The Ad Store of New York City. In the days following the show, SK+G knew that viewers would be using search engines to find out more about the agencies that participated, but the agency went beyond ensuring that it could be found.
SK+G took the competitive spirit off the air and into search by buying up paid search ads that appeared when users searched for The Ad Store, effectively diverting traffic and demonstrating its search engine marketing prowess. Smart. Responsive. Relevant.
2. Etch-a-Sketch landed into the national political conversation with a thud when a senior aide for Mitt Romney, Eric Fehrnstrom, called the Romney campaign “almost like an Etch-a-Sketch” that could be “rebooted” for the general election campaign against President Obama. The next week, the company released a series of light-hearted responsive ads that were hyper-relevant to a news cycle still at its height. The kicker? Etch-a-Sketch saw a sales jump during its historically slow season:
3. Febreze launched a popular series of broadcast TV spots, where it put unsuspecting participants in hideously dirty and odious environments that had been sprayed with the product. Their reactions were gloriously positive, as the envisioned themselves in the middle of flowery fields or and breezy days.
When the public started to question whether or not the broadcast commercials were real, the brand reacted with a experiential activation in New York City and an online video to spread its proof.
4. The national dialogue around and ultimate rejection of “pink slime” spiraled out of control and threatened the livelihood of the hamburger industry in the United States. Wendy’s, which didn’t use the substance, risked being swallowed up by the controversy along with the rest of the meat manufacturers and retailers if it didn’t respond. A full-page ad set the record straight and was highly relevant to readers’ lives. Placing it in the newspaper ensured the context supported the message.
Is your brand ready to get responsive? What situations could require it? How could your brand get nimble and jump into activation in a compressed time period (i.e. 24 hours)?
{ 1 comment }



